Translations:Marmite norvégienne/3/en : Différence entre versions

Version du 3 novembre 2021 à 12:43

Informations concernant le message (contribuer)

Ce message n’est pas documenté. Si vous savez où ou comment il est utilisé, vous pouvez aider les autres traducteurs en créant sa documentation.

Définition du message (Marmite norvégienne)

Des solutions low-tech existent pour améliorer ces quelques points. Alors que nous pouvons voir de nettes améliorations avec l'utilisation d'une cocotte-minute, ces récipients perdent encore beaucoup de chaleur à travers leurs parois souvent peu ou pas isolées. Et il y a toujours le problème des pertes au transfert de chaleur, dans le cas où l'on n'utiliserait pas de [https://wiki.lowtechlab.org/wiki/Jupe_isolante_pour_casserole jupe isolante low-tech]. Mais si le plat est porté à ébullition puis le récipient placé dans une boîte bien isolée, les pertes de chaleur sont minimisées et la cuisson peut se poursuivre sans apport d'énergie supplémentaire.

Des solutions low-tech existent pour améliorer ces quelques points. Alors que nous pouvons voir de nettes améliorations avec l'utilisation d'une cocotte-minute, ces récipients perdent encore beaucoup de chaleur à travers leurs parois souvent peu ou pas isolées. Et il y a toujours le problème des pertes au transfert de chaleur, dans le cas où l'on n'utiliserait pas de [https://wiki.lowtechlab.org/wiki/Jupe_isolante_pour_casserole jupe isolante low-tech]. Mais si le plat est porté à ébullition puis le récipient placé dans une boîte bien isolée, les pertes de chaleur sont minimisées et la cuisson peut se poursuivre sans apport d'énergie supplémentaire.

TraductionLow-tech solutions do exist for the improvement of these problems. Whilst we can see clear improvements through the use of a pressure cooker, these containers lose significant heat through their inner surfaces which are often poorly insulated or uninsulated. And there is still the problem of losses from heat transfer in the case where the low-tech insulating wrapper has not been used [https://wiki.lowtechlab.org/wiki/jupe_isolante_pour_casserole jupe isolante low-tech]. But if the food contents are brought to their boiling point and the container placed in a well-insulated box, the heat losses are minimised and the cooking can continue without the addition of further energy.

Low-tech solutions do exist for the improvement of these problems. Whilst we can see clear improvements through the use of a pressure cooker, these containers lose significant heat through their inner surfaces which are often poorly insulated or uninsulated. And there is still the problem of losses from heat transfer in the case where the low-tech insulating wrapper has not been used jupe isolante low-tech. But if the food contents are brought to their boiling point and the container placed in a well-insulated box, the heat losses are minimised and the cooking can continue without the addition of further energy.

Version du 25 septembre 2021 à 09:16 (voir la source) Bowmanm1 (discussion \| contributions) ← Modification précédente		Version du 3 novembre 2021 à 12:43 (voir la source) Bowmanm1 (discussion \| contributions) Modification suivante →
Ligne 1 :		Ligne 1 :
−	Low-tech solutions do exist for the improvement of these problems. Whilst we can see clear improvements through the use of a pressure cooker, these containers lose significant heat through their inner surfaces which are often poorly insulated or uninsulated. And there is still the problem of losses from heat transfer in the case where the low-tech insulating wrapper has not been used [~~insert link~~]. But if the food contents are brought to their boiling point and the container placed in a well-insulated box, the heat losses are minimised and the cooking can continue without the addition of further energy.	+	Low-tech solutions do exist for the improvement of these problems. Whilst we can see clear improvements through the use of a pressure cooker, these containers lose significant heat through their inner surfaces which are often poorly insulated or uninsulated. And there is still the problem of losses from heat transfer in the case where the low-tech insulating wrapper has not been used [https://wiki.lowtechlab.org/wiki/jupe_isolante_pour_casserole jupe isolante low-tech]. But if the food contents are brought to their boiling point and the container placed in a well-insulated box, the heat losses are minimised and the cooking can continue without the addition of further energy.